Mädels ihr könnt mich gerne anschreiben wenn ihr eine ehrliche ausführliche meinung haben wollt :) egal ob zu euch selber oder zu bestimmten sachen
2024.11.28 15:46 Ok_Flamingo_9221 Mädels ihr könnt mich gerne anschreiben wenn ihr eine ehrliche ausführliche meinung haben wollt :) egal ob zu euch selber oder zu bestimmten sachen
submitted by Ok_Flamingo_9221 to Snapchatgerman [link] [comments]
2024.11.28 15:46 CyberCat03 Zayne the CAT
 | So cute……I can’t resist this…(so I got the outfit 😋) submitted by CyberCat03 to LoveAndDeepspace [link] [comments] |
2024.11.28 15:46 Ill_Ad4416 Turkey with hole
I have a turkey that I took out 3 days ago it’s 13 lbs and it’s still frozen. I am submerging in sink with cold water and changing every 30 min but when I picked it up, water started coming out of the package. There is a small hole so the water is seeping through it. I am seeing mixed info online some saying it’s fine and to rinse it and others saying it can cause cross contamination also saying 100% do not rinse, and it’s not safe to submerge with a hole. I did clean out my sink beforehand.
submitted by Ill_Ad4416 to Cooking [link] [comments]
2024.11.28 15:46 dvezx H: GHB + 80 Leaders W: GSB
submitted by dvezx to Market76 [link] [comments]
2024.11.28 15:46 asmdrft Pls help me study:(
If anyone has free time here, please help me study!! I'll send the powerpoints and just ask me questions about it. No need to understand the lessons, please!! 🙏💗😓
submitted by asmdrft to AteneoDeNaga [link] [comments]
2024.11.28 15:46 Intrepid_Campaign700 Funniest scenes on the show?
I can think of a bunch of them in my head
submitted by Intrepid_Campaign700 to fullhouse [link] [comments]
2024.11.28 15:46 barkleykraken What is this?
This post contains content not supported on old Reddit. Click here to view the full post
submitted by barkleykraken to Pixelary [link] [comments]
2024.11.28 15:46 Leading-Routine6389 Mo2Timez x Scrapp - Blood On The Leaves (Adams St & Claybourne St)
 | submitted by Leading-Routine6389 to Bostonology [link] [comments] |
2024.11.28 15:46 Brettwon Got these 3 WWE DVDs for $1.50 each on Facebook!!
 | submitted by Brettwon to dvd [link] [comments] |
2024.11.28 15:46 Crafty_Girl_5845 Missy Peterson you’re pathetic!
Missy saw that Jimmy was making plates to take to the homeless. Plates with sandwiches and stuff that he’s making specifically for them.
So Missy has a dozen dinner rolls and cranberry sauce left over from her family dinner yesterday that they wouldn’t eat and two cinnamon rolls. She put them in a grocery bag and says she’s taking them to the homeless.
She’s so pathetic! She was going to give it to her dog!
submitted by Crafty_Girl_5845 to TikTok_Top99_UnBiased [link] [comments]
2024.11.28 15:46 ArcanaNoir Are Macy’s Parade performers at risk of hypothermia?
I was watching the parade today and noticed some of the performers were soaked through from the rain and the temperature is barely 50 degrees F. I’ve seen it get much colder in past years so I started wondering, is there a limit to what they make those performers endure? What if it was barely above freezing and it was raining? Is there any attention to safety?
I only see the parade on tv and so maybe the performers just do their act for the main recording area and then they get to bundle up. Does anyone know if that’s true?
submitted by ArcanaNoir to NoStupidQuestions [link] [comments]
2024.11.28 15:46 PlaybookWriter Sports Injuries and Prevention
 | submitted by PlaybookWriter to PlaybookDirectory [link] [comments] |
2024.11.28 15:46 AdSure6971 Pizza Shab (Richmond Hill ON) - $9.99
 | submitted by AdSure6971 to TooGoodToGoCanada [link] [comments] |
2024.11.28 15:46 mvdaytona Debating on which irons i should get
TaylorMade SIM 2 Max - ~€500
Cobra King Tour MIM - ~€500
Cobra AeroJet - ~€600
Cobra King LTDx - ~€530
Callaway Rogue ST MAX - ~€530
Callaway Rogue ST MAX OS - ~€530
Callaway Mavrik 22 - ~€550
Haven’t played in more than 5 years and i have to return to the game, need new equipment completely..
I was a sub 20 HCP, had a fast swing and I’m looking for something that is viable for sub 15-10 HCP, so basically long term irons. Quality and durability is my priority. Unfortunately i cannot try them out or do the fitting process, it has to be a blind buy.. :/
submitted by mvdaytona to golf [link] [comments]
2024.11.28 15:46 New-Court3665 [I Ate] “BLT” Finger sandwiches with potato chips
![[I Ate] “BLT” Finger sandwiches with potato chips](https://preview.redd.it/w8vhqv54yn3e1.jpeg?width=640&crop=smart&auto=webp&s=e0e253317f9cf8d0a58942b94666d020a70cd879 "[I Ate] “BLT” Finger sandwiches with potato chips") | submitted by New-Court3665 to food [link] [comments] |
2024.11.28 15:46 Shaunblanch Magnesium Dreams (Sleep Paralysis in Dream)
I recently started taking Magnesium Glycinate and D3 before bed to help with quality sleep. The last few nights I've had some wickedly vivid dreams - and they all follow the same format (which is me falling asleep in the dream itself).
Example - last night I had a dream that I slept walk to Grand Central (I live in NYC). And when I got there, to prove to myself I wasn't dreaming I reached out and touched the train, could feel the sensation (this was to prove to myself I'm actually awake and in Grand Central). Then in the dream, I realized I had slept-walk (I don't do this in real life), and had to wake myself up in the dream (I did not wake up in real life).
Night before I had a dream I was at a doctor's office and passed out and a friend had to come get me. I woke up at his place not knowing why I had passed out at the doctors.
These dreams seem and feel extremely real in the moment (obviously there's some hints it's a dream). I've never had back to back dreams of sleeping during the dream. It's not enough to make me stop taking the supplement, but I'm buckling up for whatever comes tonight lol.
submitted by Shaunblanch to Supplements [link] [comments]
2024.11.28 15:46 GlitchyBones Can someone draw this ss...
 | submitted by GlitchyBones to DandysWorld_ [link] [comments] |
2024.11.28 15:46 Apanops123 Swift, Conner or Ladd? (Full ppr)
submitted by Apanops123 to fantasyfootballadvice [link] [comments]
2024.11.28 15:46 chillywilly521 Using Play 1 (gen1) as surround speakers on WiFi
I have a play bar with sub running on WiFi and not bridge. I’m looking to buy some old Play 1 to use as Surround speakers , however, I thought I read it won’t work on WiFi and only using the bridge. This true?
submitted by chillywilly521 to sonos [link] [comments]
2024.11.28 15:46 Dull_Spinach_8859 Im new on nft market
Any advices for a beginner? This is my first NFT
https://opensea.io/assets/ethereum/0x804e693bf39abbc8dd4896768a67caf81b5b658f/1/
submitted by Dull_Spinach_8859 to NFTsMarketplace [link] [comments]
2024.11.28 15:46 This_Sundae7168 New arrival exotic daw sabi ni 🔌 mimosa punch and lemon slush
submitted by This_Sundae7168 to treesPH [link] [comments]
2024.11.28 15:46 thor_of_coffee Thor Thanks You! ☕️⚡️🦃
Thor thanks everyone in this community for being such an amazing group of people. You all help make this game and place a lot more fun!
Wishing everyone a Happy Thanksgiving! ☕️⚡️🦃 Hope it’s full of food, fun, great people, and of course coffee!
-Thor of Coffee ☕️⚡️
submitted by thor_of_coffee to monopolygo_fairtrade [link] [comments]
2024.11.28 15:46 alwaysbrooding Using insoles to get perfect fit
submitted by alwaysbrooding to PNWbootmakers [link] [comments]
2024.11.28 15:46 n0ahbody Dangerous pursuit
submitted by n0ahbody to editorialcartoons [link] [comments]
2024.11.28 15:46 DontGrowABrain All About the DNA: Independent forensic experts went on record to contradict the claim that the DNA in this case proves the family is innocent and supported that the DNA may not be related to the case at all
In 2016, Boulder's newspaper The Daily Camera and journalists Kevin Vaughn and Charlie Brennan shed light on what an independent group of forensic experts thought about the Ramsey DNA in an article titled, "DNA in Doubt: New analysis challenges DA's exonerations."
Here are the key takeaways:
- the existence of the DNA does not prove the family is innocent
- the DNA is not necessarily the killers
- samples from the longjohns came from at least two people in addition to the JonBenet
- the two samples were never described as a "match"; that was Mary Lacy's verbiage, not the lab's
The DNA evidence in the JonBenet Ramsey case doesn’t support a pivotal and controversial development in Colorado’s most vexing unsolved murder — a former Boulder prosecutor’s decision to clear the girl’s family from all suspicion in her death, a joint Daily Camera/9NEWS investigation has found.And the findings could cut both ways.
Forensic experts who examined the results of DNA tests obtained exclusively by the two news organizations disputed former District Attorney Mary Lacy’s conclusion that a DNA profile found in one place on JonBenet’s underpants and two locations on her long johns was necessarily the killer’s — which Lacy had asserted in clearing JonBenet’s family of suspicion.
In fact, those experts said the evidence showed that the DNA samples recovered from the long johns came from at least two people in addition to JonBenet — something Lacy’s office was told, according to documents obtained by the Camera and 9NEWS, but that she made no mention of in clearing the Ramseys.
The presence of a third person’s genetic markers has never before been publicly revealed. Additionally, the independent experts raised the possibility that the original DNA sample recovered from JonBenet’s underwear — long used to identify or exclude potential suspects — could be a composite and not that of a single individual.
“It’s a rather obvious point, but I mean, if you’re looking for someone that doesn’t exist, because actually it’s several people, it’s a problem,” said Troy Eid, a former U.S. Attorney for Colorado.The documents obtained by the Camera and 9NEWS included results from the actual DNA testing process on the long johns and summary reports sent to Lacy’s office in the months leading up her July 9, 2008, letter exonerating the Ramseys.
The experts who examined the laboratory results at the request of the Camera and 9NEWS reached similar conclusions on multiple points:
• Two of the three samples that led Lacy to declare publicly that no one in the Ramsey family could be responsible for the murder actually appear to include genetic material from at least three people: JonBenet, the person whose DNA profile originally was located in JonBenet’s underwear during testing in the late 1990s and early 2000s, plus at least one additional as-yet-unidentified person or persons. Consequently, its meaning is far from clear.
• The DNA profile referred to as Unknown Male 1 — first identified during testing on the panties — may not be the DNA of a single person at all, but, rather, a composite of genetic material from multiple individuals. As a result, it may be worthless as evidence.
• The presence of that DNA on JonBenet’s underwear and long johns, be it from one or multiple people, may very well be innocent; the profiles were developed from minute samples that could have been the result of inconsequential contact with other people, or transferred from another piece of clothing. If true, it would contradict the assertions that DNA will be key to finding JonBenet’s killer.
This represents the first time independent experts have reviewed the DNA evidence on which Lacy based her widely questioned exoneration of the family.
“It’s certainly possible that an intruder was responsible for the murder, but I don’t think that the DNA evidence proves it,” said William C. Thompson, a professor in the Department of Criminology, Law and Society at the University of California-Irvine and an internationally respected authority on DNA evidence and its applications in the criminal justice system.
Similarly, the findings don’t implicate or exonerate anyone in the family.
Ramsey lawyer Lin Wood, who has not reviewed the documents or the work of the experts consulted by the Camera and 9NEWS, said, however, “I have absolute and total confidence in the integrity of former District Attorney Mary Lacy, and I am also aware of internet comments by former Boulder police Chief Mark Beckner where he, within the last several months, affirmed that the Ramsey case was a DNA case. “So I know what Chief Beckner has said publicly in recent months, I know what … former District Attorney Mary Lacy has said, and until someone impugns her integrity, or contradicts former Chief Beckner’s statement, I continue to believe, as I have said before, that this is a DNA case and that the best chance for solving the case will be a hit and match on the DNA in the future. I hope that day comes.”
‘The silver bullet misfired’ Lacy was long known as a believer in the Ramseys’ innocence, something others noticed as early as June 1998, when Boulder police detectives put on a detailed two-day presentation of the evidence and sought either charges against John and Patsy Ramsey or a grand jury investigation.
“My impression of her response to that was that she was among the very, very skeptical,” said former Adams County District Attorney Bob Grant, who attended the police presentation in his role as adviser to then-Boulder County District Attorney Alex Hunter.
The experts consulted by the Camera and 9NEWS suggested that Lacy may have been guilty of “confirmation bias,” a phenomenon in which investigators become so blinded by their own theories that they give extra credence to evidence that supports them, and ignore evidence that does not.
The lab that performed the DNA testing, for example, told Lacy in March 2008 that it was “likely” the two samples found on JonBenet’s long johns came from “more than two people” and “should not be considered a single-source profile,” according to the documents obtained by the Camera and 9NEWS.But in exonerating the Ramseys with a three-page letter made public July 9, 2008, Lacy failed to disclose any of that, writing that “the previously identified profile from the crotch of the underwear worn by JonBenet at the time of the murder matched the DNA recovered from the long johns.
”The word “match” actually never appears in the reports from Bode Technology, which conducted the testing in March through June of 2008.
Similarly, the Camera and 9NEWS have learned that investigators in Lacy’s office suggested no additional testing was needed once they learned male DNA had been located on the long johns that she later labeled as a “match” to the DNA found in JonBenet’s panties.Correspondence from an investigator on Lacy’s staff indicated that “my bosses” were “very excited” and “pleased” about the purported match, “and don’t see the need for additional testing (unless you strongly recommend otherwise).
”The twin realities pointed to by the experts — that the genetic profile may not be from a single individual and that DNA on the girl’s clothing may have landed there innocently — turn on its head Lacy’s assertion that investigators had identified the killer’s genetic fingerprint and that it was the key critical to solving the case.Thompson, the UC-Irvine professor, noted that many people have come to see DNA evidence as a foolproof “silver bullet” to solving many crimes.“Here, the silver bullet misfired,” said Thompson, one of the experts who reviewed the evidence at the news organizations’ request.
I will put the rest of the article in the body of my post.
submitted by DontGrowABrain to JonBenetRamsey [link] [comments]