Why are all the MFs showing a negative return these days?
2025.01.19 18:40 Brief_Ad1867 Why are all the MFs showing a negative return these days?
 | https://preview.redd.it/rya7ie6gwzde1.png?width=797&format=png&auto=webp&s=829921ebcab3015b9b98ce1ef18a194254c5e096 WIll this situation improve? . i am a long term investor. My portfolio is attached in the photo. Do i need to make adjustments ,please guide me? submitted by Brief_Ad1867 to mutualfunds [link] [comments] |
2025.01.19 18:40 pile_drive_me Video update - snow chances going into Tuesday
 | submitted by pile_drive_me to AthensGAWeather [link] [comments] |
2025.01.19 18:40 octaviomono Ho-oh on me 224375661109
Ho-oh on me 224375661109
submitted by octaviomono to PokemonGoFriends [link] [comments]
2025.01.19 18:40 Daegalus Chicken Congee
 | submitted by Daegalus to EuropeEats [link] [comments] |
2025.01.19 18:40 CommunicationDry1748 Do ASMs get fixed profit sharing even if associates don't get any for that year?
submitted by CommunicationDry1748 to WalmartCanada [link] [comments]
2025.01.19 18:40 BigThonker101 7 años siguiendo en twitch
 | hoy marcan 7 años desde que sigo en twitch, y este años van a ser 10 desde que me subscribí en youtube. submitted by BigThonker101 to dedreviil [link] [comments] |
2025.01.19 18:40 Nate_C_of_2003 Are B Division (IND/BMT) tunnels generally deeper than A Division (IRT) tunnels?
It’s a little confusing to me. I know some IRT lines (like the Flushing Line) have deeper tunnels in Manhattan than some BMT/IND lines at certain points but it appears that those on the B Division are deeper in more places than the A Dvision. Also, after searching the Internet, it seems IRT ran streetcars before actual subway trains, which would (in theory) require tunnels to not be as deep as actual subway tunnels. But the fact that some IRT tunnels are actually deeper just threw me off. So, are the IRT tunnels not as deep, or deeper than those on the BMT and IND lines?
submitted by Nate_C_of_2003 to nycrail [link] [comments]
2025.01.19 18:40 Humble_Valuable9430 Toty Icon 🙏
Packed Pele Toty Icon from 83x5 midfielders pack in my second attempt.
submitted by Humble_Valuable9430 to fut [link] [comments]
2025.01.19 18:40 HumanEmbodimentofPie Week 2: Scotland - Tattie Scones and Oatcakes
 | I had aspirations of a Full Scottish Breakfast but restrictions of time and willing consumers of blood sausage got in the way. What made it to the table was:
submitted by HumanEmbodimentofPie to 52weeksofcooking [link] [comments] |
2025.01.19 18:40 Extension-Storage666 Exotics - B30 Violet Ostrich - GPC/Steven
2025.01.19 18:40 elvispresleylova TikTok is not back for me 😔
submitted by elvispresleylova to TikTok [link] [comments]
2025.01.19 18:40 jee05 Can someone explain this basic audit concept to me like I’m a 5 year old?
submitted by jee05 to RiskandControls [link] [comments]
2025.01.19 18:40 burner_duh Doxycycline safe before/during stims?
I am approaching my second retrieval. Toward the end of my first retrieval, I started breaking out in painful, hormonal pimples on my jawline. They got so big, so fast that my skin was sort of breaking in places. It's been awful. I got a prescription for doxycycline from a regular doctor because it was quickly becoming a crime scene on my face. But now I'm worried -- I'm about to start another round of stims and ER. Do I need to stop taking the doxycycline? I was actually prescribed doxycycline for the last few days of stims and a day post-retrieval last time, so I thought this would be OK. But do any of you know something more specific? Thanks for any insights you can provide.
submitted by burner_duh to IVF [link] [comments]
2025.01.19 18:40 Liammgnr Algorithm
Hello why is the yt algorithm better than yt music ? When i start a song on my tv the algorithm of next songs better than on yt music on my Phone why ?
submitted by Liammgnr to YoutubeMusic [link] [comments]
2025.01.19 18:40 Life_well_liv3d Finally Quiting!
My wife has worked for walgreens for 18 years . Started in FL back in 2006ish then in NY. All her time in those two states she didnt have any issues. Got great reviews. Moved to Chicago and the climate from corporate is totally different.
As an exa she's required to work 44 hours. Her managers arent happy with her unless she's pulling 50+ and no matter what she does its never enough.
Her boss going off on her the other day "How did you even get promoted" was the final straw. Every manger she has had in Chicago has been a toxic POS.
submitted by Life_well_liv3d to WalgreensStores [link] [comments]
2025.01.19 18:40 stereomatch Labos: No, ivermectin doesn’t cure cancer, either - Montreal Gazette opinion piece against Mel Gibson mentioning that Ivermectin reversed cancer in 3 friends with stage 4 cancer (mentioned on Joe Rogan show)
The Montreal Gazette publishes a very weak opinion piece that tries to counter Mel Gibson's promotion of Ivermectin as a treatment for stage 4 cancers (see article below)
Mel Gibson appeared on Joe Rogan and mentioned 3 stage 4 cancer cases among his friends reversing with Fenbendazole/Ivermectin protocol
Since the Joe Rogan podcast has viewership that exceeds all TV news channels in US combined, this is being seen as a direct threat to the capture of cancer treatment by traditional medicine practice (which discounts metabolic approach and gears most efforts towards genetic approach to cancer treatment)
The article fails to provide any proof that "Ivermectin doesn't work" or couldn't work
Esp for the stage 4 demographic which has few treatments from traditional medicine practices
The rebuttal also fails to address Fenbendazole and focuses mainly on Ivermectin - and tries to create a narrative of why someone might think IVM works (the whole background of the pandemic and IVM)
For context, here is the Mel Gibson appearance on Joe Rogan:
https://www.reddit.com/cancer_metabolic/comments/1hxzy74/mel_gibson_on_joe_rogan_reversing_stage_4_cance
Mel Gibson on Joe Rogan - reversing stage 4 cancer - it can't get more mainstream than this - when random celebrities have friends who have reversed stage 4 cancer with Fenbendazole/Ivermectin/Mebendazole
This article was posted on ivermectin and I raised some questions on the questionable logical arguments in the article
I am reproducing them below here:
https://www.reddit.com/ivermectin/s/a2LJMQQS9a
Thanks for posting this article.
I find it interesting how there is a different interpretation of reality in the medical field
If they can justify something cures sometimes (esp if there is a commercial interests - like that recent Alzheimer's drug which most didn't think should be approved but was approved nonetheless)
Then it is considered "science"
And pushing that treatment is not challenged
However if a drug has not passed through these stages - may have a public following and lots of anecdotal reports - then it is not considered as an approved treatment
This is valid, in that it is playing by the rules
HOWEVER, what actually happens - that is not science - is that an "approved" treatment is called a possible cure
And the drug that has not been approved yet - is called that "it is not a cure" (note the language in the article)
To be precise, they should say it is not an "approved treatment" - that would be fine and it would be accurate
What I find surprising is that the fact checkers/debunkers ALSO go overboard - and say that "it is not a cure" or "it does not work"
This is overreach
How do they know it actually doesn't work?
If to say that something works requires proof
Then to be accurate, one also needs to provide proof why something doesn't work conclusively
The number of stage 4 cases we are seeing reversing with Fenben/IVM is starting to exceed what one would expect for a rare event of stage 4 reversal
Given the "potential" of benefit this suggests, the burden of proof that Fenben/IVM "doesn't work" is considerable
And these fact checkers are unable to provide that proof - that would make the public ignore the growing anecdotal evidence
It is also even more untenable an approach given the traditional treatments for stage 4 are largely ineffective - do not guarantee remission or reversal
In such a context, the burden on Ivermectin should be less, given the traditional treatments are not that effective either (yet fact checkers like to compare Ivermectin effectiveness to a perfect cure)
Summary: if the public is convinced of something - then regulators, if they want to debunk that, also need to bear the burden of proof that "it does not work"
Absence of "it works" is not the same as "it does not work"
Saying "it is not an approved treatment" is more appropriate - BUT when there is panic about loss of revenue then fact checkers and locusts lobbyists can slip up and overreach
Article:
https://www.montrealgazette.com/opinion/columnists/article674062.html
Labos: No, ivermectin doesn’t cure cancer, either
By Christopher Labos
January 15, 2025
Mel Gibson claims three friends were cured of Stage 4 cancer by taking ivermectin. Readers would be well served to ignore everything the actor says with regard to medical therapies, writes Dr. Christopher Labos.
Recent events have only reinforced my belief that you should never take health advice from Hollywood actors.
On Joe Rogan’s podcast, actor Mel Gibson announced that three of his friends had Stage 4 cancer and were cured by taking ivermectin.
Readers would be well served to ignore everything he says with regard to medical therapies.
Just as ivermectin failed as a way to prevent and treat COVID-19, it has no role in treating cancer.
Believing celebrities’ medical advice will usually only make you sicker.
Before COVID, most people had probably never heard of ivermectin because it is mainly used to treat parasitic infections. But it is an objectively amazing drug and its impact on global health led to William Campbell and Satoshi Omura receiving a Nobel Prize.
Ivermectin was discovered in 1970 and was initially used to treat parasitic infections in animals and was widely used in veterinary medicine.
However, by the 1980s, researchers found it could also be used in humans to treat onchocerciasis, also known as river blindness.
Though rare in North America, globally onchocerciasis is one of the most important causes of preventable blindness.
Manufacturer Merck ultimately decided to supply ivermectin free of charge to developing countries in an effort to combat the disease.
Excitement over this medication was amplified when it became clear it had a broad spectrum of activity and could treat roundworm parasites like strongyloides, as well as conditions like lice or scabies.
But despite its amazing properties, ivermectin is not magic. It doesn’t treat COVID and it doesn’t treat cancer. Its popularity during the pandemic is both hard and easy to understand.
In the early days of COVID, much research was being produced that was preliminary and non-definitive. One study suggested ivermectin could stop the replication of the virus in a petri dish. There were obvious shortcomings to this paper, namely that viruses and parasites are not the same thing and this was a lab paper, not a study in humans.
Still, the idea took hold with prominent celebrities like Aaron Rodgers and Rogan buying into the hype. Many more studies would come … and then go.
Advocates would point to a 2021 study from Lebanon, but it was retracted when irregularities in the data were discovered.
Another meta-analysis of ivermectin studies also had to be retracted. This past weekend, the 12th retraction of an ivermectin study was announced.
All these retractions stand against the good quality studies that failed to show ivermectin has any benefit for either hospitalized patients or outpatients with COVID-19.
But it stopped being about science long ago. Ivermectin became a rallying cry for those who opposed vaccinations because contrarianism can only take you so far.
Opponents of public health measures had to provide some alternative solution and ivermectin fit the bill.
In that respect, it’s probably not surprising it’s now being touted as a cancer cure. When you declare something a miracle drug, there becomes no limit to its uses in your own mind.
But no cancer doctors are giving people ivermectin to cure their disease. Some researchers are looking at combining ivermectin with other chemotherapies to boost their effectiveness, but these are preliminary studies that may very well follow the same trajectory seen during COVID: initial enthusiasm that doesn’t pan out.
I don’t know who Gibson’s friends are or what the truth of their medical history actually is. But ivermectin is not the magical cure he claims it to be.
When we are unconstrained by facts, medications can do anything and treat everything. But in the real world, meds have specific uses. They work in some circumstances and not others.
Ivermectin actually is a wonder drug. It can treat a devastating parasitic infection that can leave you blind. It just won’t cure COVID-19 or metastatic cancer, no matter what celebrities say.
Christopher Labos is a Montreal physician, co-host of the Body of Evidence podcast and author of Does Coffee Cause Cancer?
submitted by stereomatch to cancer_metabolic [link] [comments]
2025.01.19 18:40 CoolcatTNT Solved the mystery of the broken front guard
 | Had to use filmography cuz they took down capcut submitted by CoolcatTNT to fpv [link] [comments] |
2025.01.19 18:40 Altruistic_Comment87 Tinys minions trying hard to cover his ass about laras van.
 | submitted by Altruistic_Comment87 to heronotzero [link] [comments] |
2025.01.19 18:40 dirtyharrison Watch Live: Breitbart in D.C. Ahead of Trump's Second Inauguration
 | submitted by dirtyharrison to NewsWhatever [link] [comments] |
2025.01.19 18:40 BOOBIES_ARE_LOVE Test on egg
 | submitted by BOOBIES_ARE_LOVE to gifsthatendtoosoon [link] [comments] |
2025.01.19 18:40 Jaded_Medium6145 Hiby music player on M300
Been trying out different music apps on my M300. For some reason, the Hiby music app sounds pretty bad compared to the VLC or Music Player. The Hiby music app sounds lower, female vocals recessed, the music in general sounds muffled. In contrast, the music played thru the other 2 apps sounds great. Music files are either FLAC or mp3 with no EQ. Is there something I am missing with the Hiby app?
submitted by Jaded_Medium6145 to Hiby [link] [comments]
2025.01.19 18:40 JabariusStark05 Top 1% people mindset
 | submitted by JabariusStark05 to HolUp [link] [comments] |
2025.01.19 18:40 AggravatingMood9297 In desperate need of mega fennec fox and adds!
submitted by AggravatingMood9297 to AdoptMeTradingRoblox [link] [comments]
2025.01.19 18:40 Soufiaaaaane Seeking Advice: Dark Rectal Bleeding, Bowel Changes, and Gas – Worried About Cancer or IBD or IBS ?
Hi everyone, I’m a 26-year-old male with a history of health anxiety. I don't have a family history of cancer or IBD, but my father and uncle may have had IBS (idk for sure ). I wanted to ask about some symptoms I've been experiencing, as they’ve been causing me a lot of stress and sleepless nights.
About 5 months ago, I noticed dark rectal bleeding while pooping. but i must say that i always had large, solid stools then, so I freaked out about the possibility of cancer. Unfortunately, I didn't have access to healthcare at the time, so I couldn't do anything. I should also mention that I had been biking daily with an uncomfortable seat around the time this started.
Over the months, the symptoms have fluctuated. I’ve noticed that the toilet water occasionally turns reddish, and while the bleeding didn’t again, . This time, about two weeks ago i noticed bright red or maroon blood on the toilet paper when I wiped myself, which really stressed me out. I went to the doctor, who confirmed that I have hemorrhoids (which have been present for months). She ordered blood tests, a calprotectin test, and a urine test, and gave me medication and a cream for the hemorrhoids for 10 days. Since then, I’ve seen again bright red blood on toilet paper once last week, and no more red water in the toilet.
However, I’m still feeling uneasy, especially with some new symptoms. Here’s what I’ve been noticing lately:
- After eating, I experience excessive gas – I fart a lot, immediately after eating, and often (especially after eating fiber-rich foods) the gas is extremely smelly.
- My stools are inconsistent. The first stool is hard enough with normal texture, but subsequent stools are often loose, mushy, and sometimes nearly diarrheal.
Could this be something like IBD or another digestive issue or cancer? I’d love any advice or thoughts on what might be going on. and What can I do in the meantime ?
Thank you so much for your help!
submitted by Soufiaaaaane to AskDoctorSmeeee [link] [comments]
2025.01.19 18:40 foodlover9891 Malaika Arora
 | submitted by foodlover9891 to actressheaven [link] [comments] |