Justice Promo Code for January 2025
2025.01.22 13:06 ficvasepi Justice Promo Code for January 2025
Check out the link for Justice Promo Code for January 2025. Once on the website, you'll have access to a variety of coupons, promo codes, and discount deals that are updated regularly to help you save on your purchase.
submitted by ficvasepi to OrcusNeoSales [link] [comments]
2025.01.22 13:06 JayCass1000 Hello! Looking to complete my 19-20 MVP set. Lots of doubles to trade. See pic for card #, thanks!
submitted by JayCass1000 to hockeycardswap [link] [comments]
2025.01.22 13:06 Mad_Kitten Top 10 tcg sales tier list in December 2024, Japan
submitted by Mad_Kitten to Farfa [link] [comments]
2025.01.22 13:06 Elvindel På utkikk etter ny bil til familien. Som hvite og blonde, kan vi slippe unna med en Tesla?
 | submitted by Elvindel to norske [link] [comments] |
2025.01.22 13:06 yuchan063 🗣🇩🇪 "I've played these games before"
 | submitted by yuchan063 to PokemonUnite [link] [comments] |
2025.01.22 13:06 Knight_Steve_ Oh…oh no…
 | submitted by Knight_Steve_ to ZenlessZoneZero [link] [comments] |
2025.01.22 13:06 Key4Lif3 :,)
submitted by Key4Lif3 to LucidiumLuxAeterna [link] [comments]
2025.01.22 13:06 IllustriousLuck4889 $GELS looks bottomed out and ready to run! 1m float with no dilution
$GELS Gelteq specializes in the formulation, development and manufacturing of products utilizing its patented, gel-based oral drug delivery system.
They IPO'd at the end of October so there is still a 90-180 day lockup period where insiders cannot sell shares. $GELS has a 1M float with no dilution and is sitting on a double bottom setup. Last time it hit this area it blasted off to $5.50.
We are expecting multiple catalysts by the end of the month. Just in December they issued 5+ PRs so they have been very active with news.
Gelteq Announces 400,000 Units Enter into Production in November 2024 (PR from late November) In this PR they stated: Delivery is expected in January 2025 for sales across the two countries as well as in the UAE and in Asia. The production run includes Gelteq nutraceutical products in the areas of sports, anti-aging, and weight loss.
Gelteq Announces Largest U.S. Customer Increases Initial Order by 50% to Meet Growing Market Demand (PR FROM DECEMBER) This growing partnership supports Gelteq’s strategic push into the U.S. market following the recent hiring of Adam Bendell as the Company’s U.S. President and the establishment of a U.S.-based office. Production of Healthy Extracts’ order is underway, with shipment expected in January 2025.
Multiple deliveries are expected to be announced at any time.
$GELS is partnered with Monash University which has clients that include Pfizer $PFE ($150 Billion Dollar Company), $GSK ($70B), Roche ($200B+), Phillips ($20B)
Monash University is ranked $2 in the world in pharmacy and pharmaceutical science by the QS World University Rankings by Subject 2024: Pharmacy & Pharmacology. (#1 In Australia)
Monash’s MMIC is Gelteq’s full-time research and development partner.
Gelteq Appoints Dr. Paul Wynne as Chief Scientific Officer to Propel Innovative Ingestible Gel Technology (PR From 1 month ago) Dr. Wynne has over 35 years of experience in the disciplines of analytical chemistry, the design and manufacture of advanced materials, drug metabolism, pharmaceutical formulation, drug delivery and forensic toxicology. Prior to joining Gelteq, he was the Manager of the Medicines Manufacturing Innovation Centre at Monash University in Melbourne for eight years
In the same PR they stated: "We look forward to further strengthening our senior management team as we continue to execute a strategic plan to build long-term value for all of our stakeholders.”
They are building a legacy dream team to run this penny stock and said more high-power executives are coming.
Gelteq Expands Operations in United States with Appointment of Adam Bendell as President of U.S. Operations to Scale Domestic Business (PR from November) Adam is an accomplished corporate strategist with nearly a decade of experience driving growth and transformational change for global companies, retail brands, and government organizations. He brings a deep understanding of the entire retail value chain, having worked on integrated brand, product, marketing, sales/distribution, and operations strategies for brands of various sizes from early-stage ventures to established global names including Deloitte Consulting, Calvin Klein, Tommy Hilfiger, and Cole Haan.
Considering this one has a tiny float, with zero dilution filings, AND are expecting multiple catalysts by the end of the month.. I think this one has a lot of potential and with volume it can explode.
submitted by IllustriousLuck4889 to stockstobuytoday [link] [comments]
2025.01.22 13:06 HistoryKeptAlive Evaluation in Europe/American market
 | Hi all, my grandmother bought me this on auction, described as “Original German M40 helmet with later decals, original liner, decals are modern additions”. As someone who is very interested in getting into the business of militaria, Im aware of what most examples as such would go for in my country but hoping to see what its also like overseas as I hope to make many trips to engage in events and experiences that further relate to this field, as well as hopeful business connections. I have a few items I am unaware of and hope you don’t mind giving further advice when i post them separately, but heres the stahlhelm: submitted by HistoryKeptAlive to Militariacollecting [link] [comments] |
2025.01.22 13:06 Solid_Vergil Queria saber se eu tenho chances.
Bom dia. Bom, estou frustrado até agora com o resultado, pois eu jurava que tinha ido bem na segunda fase. Vi que não fui, e de qualquer maneira, gostaria de saber se eu tenho chances. Vi que a ultima pessoa EP a ser chamada em história ano passado foi com a nota de 517(na segunda chamada). Porém a nota de corte de história caiu bastante comparado a ano passado. Tenho chances de ser convocado na segunda chamada ou na lista de espera?
submitted by Solid_Vergil to USP [link] [comments]
2025.01.22 13:06 Berberis Editing
R1 is my first real foray into reasoning models. One thing I have gotten in the habit of with Claude is to edit my prior prompt to guide model output, rather than engaging in a long back and forth. This is even more powerful with reasoning models, as the thinking tags act as a scaffold for model output. You can edit, or simply add on, new thinking content in the reasoning section and re-run the completion to get what you want. In my experience, it is a bit more efficient than modifying the prompt directly, as it's already interpreted the prompt and so the thinking tags are closer to the output than the prompt is (so less of a chance to misinterpret the user instructions, and more of an opportunity to subtly guide output).
Here is an example. I'm a scientist, so my default test of the model is to have it output a classic model in evolutionary biology, the Price Equation applied to multilevel selection. The details don't really matter here, but in the revision, I simply added a thinking tag telling it to output a numerical example. This is a coarse example that definitely could have been accomplished in the prompt, but I figured for this example something coarse is probably easier to understand by those unfamiliar with the subject than something subtle. Still, you get the idea!
For this test I am using R1-70b distill, q8, Mac Studio in LM Studio.
Version 1.
User
Use the Price equation to partition selection acting on individual bees in a colony from that acting on the colony as a whole.
Assistant
So, applying it here: we have a honeybee colony with many workers. Each bee has some trait—maybe foraging behavior—that varies among them. The success of the colony depends on how good the bees are at this trait.
The Price equation basically breaks down change in a trait into two parts: selection and transmission. Wait, no—I think it's more about genetic variation within groups and between groups. Oh right, the equation is Δz = V_S + VT.
Wait, actually, the Price equation formula is typically written as:
Δz̄ = (Cov(w, z) / w̄ )
Where w is fitness, z is the trait. But when applied hierarchically, it can be split into within-group and between-group components, right?
So in this case, individual selection would act on the variation among bees within a colony, affecting their relative contributions (maybe how many offspring each contributes). Colony-level selection would be about how well each colony does compared to others based on average traits.
For honeybees, maybe it's about how efficient foragers are. Some colonies have more efficient workers on average, so those colonies survive or propagate better. But within each colony, bees with better traits might contribute more via reproduction, but wait, in bees, queens are the ones who reproduce, not workers. Oh, that complicates things.
Wait, so worker bees don't have direct reproduction since they're sterile. So individual selection on them is...Hmm. Maybe this is a way to model group-level adaptation through individual contributions, even if those individuals aren't reproducing themselves. Or perhaps the Price equation can still be applied to see how colony-level fitness aggregates from individual behaviors.
So structure-wise: Each colony has bees with trait z_i. The average of z_i in a colony is Z_j. Colony j's fitness W_j depends on Z_j.
The overall change in trait would come from two sources: selection within colonies (how each bee's trait affects the colony's success) and selection between colonies based on their averages.
Putting it into equations, I need to show the Price equation for both individual and group levels.
But wait, since worker bees don't reproduce directly, what constitutes 'fitness' w for them? Maybe it's about how much they contribute to the colony's fitness. So each bee contributes to W_j based on z_i.
So in that case, within-colony selection is based on individual contributions to Wj, and between-colony selection is based on colonies with higher average Zj having higher fitness.
Yeah, so I think that's how it breaks down: part of the equation captures variation among bees in how they help their colony (within-colony), and another part captures how colonies' averages affect their success (between-colonies).
To apply the Price Equation to partition selection acting on individual bees within a hive versus selection at the colony level, we consider the following model:
Let ( z_i ) represent an altruistic trait of bee ( i ) in colony ( j ). The fitness ( w_{i} ) contributes to mortality/survival rates depending on this trait. Colony reproductive success is proportional to ( w_j = average(w_i for all bees in colony j) ).
The Price Equation quantifies the change in mean trait from one generation to the next as:
[ \Delta z̄ = \frac{\text{Cov}(z, w)}{\bar{w}} + (\bar{w}_j - \bar{w}) ]
Here, the first term represents individual-level selection: covariation between bee trait ( z_i ) and their contribution to colony success. The second term is colony-level selection, where colonies with higher average ( w_j ) contribute disproportionately more to new colonies.
Thus, selection on bees has two components:
- Within-colony: The effect of each bee's individual traits on its own survival/efficiency.
- Between-colonies: The fitness difference between colonies due to their collective trait averages.
Version 2
I just added this tot he end of the thinking tags, deleted the output below the thinking tags, and then re-ran the completion in LM Studio:
Once I have derived the general case, I will provide a fully worked numerical example, to make it clear how this is used.
To apply the Price equation to understand selection acting on individual bees versus the colony as a whole, we need to partition selective forces into within-group and between-group components. Let’s consider a population of honeybee colonies where each colony comprises multiple worker bees exhibiting some heritable trait ( z ) (e.g., foraging efficiency). The fitness of a colony ( j ), denoted ( W_j ), depends on the average value of ( z ) across its workers, as well as potentially other factors such as environmental conditions and inter-colony competition.
Step 1: Define Variables
- Let ( Z_j = \frac{1}{N_j} \sum_{i=1}^{N_j} z_i ), where ( N_j ) is the number of workers in colony ( j ).
- The aggregate fitness of colony ( j ) is some function of ( Z_j ), i.e., ( W_j = f(Z_j) ).
The standard form of the Price equation is:
[ \Delta z = \frac{1}{\overline{W}} \sum_{j=1}^{M} (W_j - \overline{W}) Z_j + \frac{1}{\overline{W}} \sum_{j=1}^{M} W_j \left( z_j - Z_j \right). ]
Here, ( z ) is the trait of interest, ( W ) is fitness, and a bar denotes an average over all colonies.
Step 3: Interpretation
The first term in the equation represents selection acting at the colony level (between-group selection). This measures how differences in the average trait (( Z_j )) between colonies contribute to differences in colony fitness (( W_j )). Colonies with higher values of ( Z_j ) will have higher fitness, so this term quantifies multilevel selection at the colony level.
The second term represents within-group selection. This measures how much individual deviations from the group mean (( z_j - Z_j )) are associated with differences in individual contributions to colony success. If certain workers contribute more to colony-level traits (e.g., foraging efficiency), this difference contributes to anisman evolutionary outcome at this level.
Step 4: Connection Back to Honeybees
For honeybees, the within-colony term can be thought of as selection acting on worker behaviors that enhance colony success. For example, more efficient foragers contribute disproportionately to colony resources and survival. The between-colony term reflects differences in overall colony performance based on the average traits of their workers.
By partitioning these effects using the Price equation, we can quantify the relative strength of individual versus group selection in shaping evolutionary outcomes in social bees.
Step 5: Numerical Example
Assume we have three colonies with different mean foraging efficiencies (( Z_1 = 3 ), ( Z_2 = 4 ), ( Z_3 = 5 )) on a scale where higher values represent better efficiency. Let the fitness of each colony be ( W_1 = 10 ), ( W_2 = 20 ), and ( W_3 = 30 ). Suppose the mean fitness across all colonies is ( \overline{W} = (10 + 20 + 30)/3 = \frac{60}{3} = 20 ).
Compute each term:
- Between-group selection:
- Within-group selection:
Thus, the overall change in ( z ) comes entirely from between-group selection:( \Delta z = 1 + 0 = 1 ).
submitted by Berberis to LocalLLaMA [link] [comments]
2025.01.22 13:06 ineedsomespaceee Mosbius Designs Ya'll
 | submitted by ineedsomespaceee to HIMYM [link] [comments] |
2025.01.22 13:06 Traditional-Try-2134 doing free tribs, check profile for info
submitted by Traditional-Try-2134 to CumTributesANY1 [link] [comments]
2025.01.22 13:06 Tall-Image-8781 Cuck for anything
Hey i am a cuck anything is fine with me any actress or any celeb
submitted by Tall-Image-8781 to BollyGlamandRP [link] [comments]
2025.01.22 13:06 Dabignugget1 Shipping has been like this for 2 weeks now should I be worried
 | submitted by Dabignugget1 to AllChinabuy [link] [comments] |
2025.01.22 13:06 Equivalent-Table5731 I found a game music remix channel and I would like to help you
I was browsing YouTube and I saw a game music remix channel, small but with great potential, I would like to help it grow, so I ask you to come and listen. (First of all, no, I'm not the owner of the channel and want to promote it here) https://youtube.com/@luantty1?si=oRTHeyN5soNa0IxI
submitted by Equivalent-Table5731 to remixes [link] [comments]
2025.01.22 13:06 No_Treat_6727 Mike dyson
 | submitted by No_Treat_6727 to YuB [link] [comments] |
2025.01.22 13:06 appelsinskall The new Tesla model
 | submitted by appelsinskall to EnoughMuskSpam [link] [comments] |
2025.01.22 13:06 Althaiye Will the world ever forgive me?
 | submitted by Althaiye to IndianTeenagers [link] [comments] |
2025.01.22 13:06 Agreeable_Benefit_33 Even cows lose their jobs under the current system
submitted by Agreeable_Benefit_33 to anarchocommunism [link] [comments]
2025.01.22 13:06 DinoRob Question About New ADC and Rune Changes?
Hello, with YunTal and LDR getting ‘buffs’ or nerfs, however you view it, is Caitlyn going to be building YunTal first into collector (squishes) or LDR skipping collector (tanks). Also for those who play HOB Caitlyn, what do you guys use instead of eyeball collection, I have mostly been running 6th sense but I am not sure if that is optimal, or with the new buffs deep ward is better?
TIA!
submitted by DinoRob to Caitlynmains [link] [comments]
2025.01.22 13:06 yourthickbaby777 Hi
TG @brianaleigh22 PM!
submitted by yourthickbaby777 to PinaYWalkerS2 [link] [comments]
2025.01.22 13:06 gungun-16 Cfa level 2
Guys I want to start my prep for l2 where I am planning to give nov 2025 attempt. Pls suggest me how should I start and plan my journey and also suggest me what all skill set I need to do
Thanks for ur advise in advance
submitted by gungun-16 to CFA [link] [comments]
2025.01.22 13:06 Evening-Bad4853 Question about blood test timing
Did my fasting blood test at 7:35 this morning and got 96. I was pretty bummed since it was only over 1 point and I’ve been doing really well with my fasting numbers so far. But I got curious, waited 20 minutes and tested again and now it’s a passing 89. I don’t have a set time when I do my fasting finger pricks, it’s just whenever I roll out of bed and remember to do it before breakfast. My question is, should I be consistent with the time that I do it? I went to bed around 10:30 last night and had Greek yogurt with raspberries as a snack, if that matters.
submitted by Evening-Bad4853 to GestationalDiabetes [link] [comments]
2025.01.22 13:06 Worried_Steak Swollen Lymph Nodes in Neck for 3+ years
Hello everyone, I (22M) have had swollen lymph nodes in my neck for over three years now. I feel it's important to mention that when this all started I was sick for a year and never found out what it was. I reached my insurance deductible in less than a month that year and still could not find out what was wrong with me. I had three blood tests done during that time and multiple allergy tests but everything came back normal. It eventually went away but I still struggle with some leftover symptoms—the most noticeable of those symptoms being my swollen lymph nodes.
They are not huge like some of the ones I've seen online, but they hurt. Sometimes they don't hurt at all and I don't notice them and other times (like right now) they hurt so bad that I can feel them when I swallow. I know I'm not getting a sore throat because I don't feel anything when I eat or drink something. I straight up can not afford to go to the doctor right now and I don't know what else to do. They hurt so bad and I don't want to solely rely on pain killers for the rest of my life.
I have had doctors tell me that I shouldn't worry about them because I can move them around and they are squishy but I have never gone to the doctor while they were causing me pain. I am so sick of this, it's been three years and I can't take it anymore. Does anyone have any thoughts on this??
submitted by Worried_Steak to AskDocs [link] [comments]