Does rehab works for 70+ yo?
2025.01.26 07:00 Faraz_i Does rehab works for 70+ yo?
According to my parents and relatives, my lola is addicted on gambling (sabong) ever since she was a teenager pa po.
Like sa sobrang adik nya halos inaabot na sya ng hating gabi ng uwi or may magsesend ng pic. and magsasabi sa mga tito ko na kakilala nila na umaabot na ng ibang province si lola para lang makapag sabong. And umaabot na sa ninanakawan nya na lahat para lang may pangsabong sya. Kapag wala syang pera sobra syang makapagsalita halos nattrauma na kami.
So last year 3 out of 5 nina mama ay nagdecide na ipa-rehab sya. Unfortunately, ayaw nung bunso nila since matanda na raw si lola which is 70+ na (pero sobrang lakas nya pa for her age) so hindi na naman natuloy.
Kanina lang, pumunta sya dito sa bahay kasi may hinahanap daw sya (binukod na nga pala sya ng bahay since last year kasi sobrang magulo nga nya), ako at si kuya lang natira sa bahay. At first, naghahanap sya nung hinahanap nya and rinig ko sya from labahan namin sa labas.
So nagpakampante ako na naghahanap nga lang sya and then not until wala na kong narinig na naghahanap so dali-dali po akong unakyat sa 2nd floor namin, and then naabutan ko syang pababa ng hagdan sabay sabing “uwi na ako, di ko makita yung hinahanap ko na chichirya. San ko kaya naiwan yon?”. Pagka akyat ko halatang binuklat mga bag. Binilqng ko agad yung pera ko and unfortunately, nakuhanan ako ng 1k na pambayad ko sana sa tuition ko na duedate na bukas. And wala na halos extra yun.
Sobrang nanginginig pa rin ako since di ko pedeng sabihin na nawalan ako kasi for sure ako sisishin ng mga relative ko na hindi ko tinago yung pera.
So ayon, kaya pa kayang iparehab ang ganyung age and how to convince mga boomer na rekatives na ipa-rehab sya?
submitted by Faraz_i to Philippines [link] [comments]
2025.01.26 07:00 AutoModerator Weekly Batuu Trip Planning Thread
Are you seeking tips and advice for an upcoming trip to Batuu? Have any other concerns about reservations, RotR Boarding Groups, lightsaber issues, merchandise stock and other general questions about Galaxy's Edge?
Feel free to ask here!
This weekly post is here to help you plan your trip to Batuu and get advice from experienced Travelers in our GalaxysEdge community.
Please remember to indicate which park you're planning to visit in your comment.
Also, make sure to also browse our top stickied FAQ post, for answers and guidance on the most frequently asked questions in the community.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Want to live chat with other Travelers who have visited Batuu? Join our friends over in the Galaxy's Edge Discord. Click to join!
submitted by AutoModerator to GalaxysEdge [link] [comments]
2025.01.26 07:00 boycecodd Most GPs say everyday stress is mislabelled as mental illness
submitted by boycecodd to unitedkingdom [link] [comments]
2025.01.26 07:00 Fuck-spez85 N64 prices are getting ridiculous
 | submitted by Fuck-spez85 to Shittygamecollecting [link] [comments] |
2025.01.26 07:00 AutoModerator Daily Fasting Check-in!
- Type of fast (water, juice, smoking, etc.)
- Context of fast (start, end, day x of y, etc.)
- Length of fast (8 hours, 3 days, etc.)
- Why? What you hope to accomplish with your fast
- Notes How is it going so far? Any concerns? Insights to share?
submitted by AutoModerator to intermittentfasting [link] [comments]
2025.01.26 07:00 Massive_Duty_6280 can't stop jerking to my sis dm or disc: fahad142142
submitted by Massive_Duty_6280 to AbbychampNSFW [link] [comments]
2025.01.26 07:00 MujeTeHaakh Profile: Syed Ali Shah Geelani
 | https://preview.redd.it/sopwzf3kdafe1.png?width=2500&format=png&auto=webp&s=86ff71d287501e665bb45fa713f37939f8ec8071 Introduction Not many Kashmiri Muslims might share his particular hardliner version of Islam or his passionate advocacy of Kashmir’s accession to Pakistan, but, still, 82-year old Syed Ali Shah Geelani commands widespread respect among his people for his firm stance on azadi or freedom of Jammu and Kashmir from Indian rule, a stance that he has never wavered from. Geelani’s popularity among vast numbers of Kashmiri Muslims rests principally in the fact that he is seen as one Kashmiri leader who has never compromised with India, and who has had to face considerable personal privation, including long bouts of imprisonment, for denouncing what he, like many Kashmiris, regard as India’s illegal occupation of Jammu and Kashmir and its violation on a massive scale of human rights in the region. With Kashmir up in flames again, Geelani’s word is now almost law to the intrepid Kashmiri youth out in the streets defying the might of the Indian state with stones. The overwhelming response to his calls for strikes and demonstrations that have rocked the Kashmir Valley for several weeks now in protest against the killing of youths by Indian armed forces clearly indicates that Geelani is back at the centre-stage of Kashmir politics. It would not be an exaggeration to claim that he is regarded by many Kashmiri Muslims as the unparalleled icon of their resistance to Indian rule. Geelani is one of the few Kashmiri leaders to have written extensively on the Kashmir conflict, authoring over a dozen books (all in Urdu) on different dimensions of the issue.[1] A collection of press statements, letters to Indian and Pakistani Prime Ministers and other leaders (many written during long bouts in various Indian prisons), interviews given to Kashmiri, and, especially, Pakistani journalists, and public addresses, Geelani’s Kashmir: Nava-e Hurriyat(‘Kashmir: Voice of Freedom’) deals with various aspects of the Kashmir issue as he views them. [2] Based on an analysis of Nava-e Hurriyat, this article lays out Geelani’s understanding of the genesis of the Kashmir conflict, his critique of Indian rule, his advocacy for Kashmir’s accession to Pakistan, his opposition to independence for Jammu and Kashmir or the ‘third option’ his understanding of the relationship between Islam, politics and the state, and his views on jihad, nationalism and inter-community relations within what he deems as the normative Islamic paradigm—all issues very central to the ongoing conflict in and over Jammu and Kashmir. The article also discusses a central paradox: If, as numerous surveys indicate, only a minority, and a diminishing one at that, of the Muslims of Jammu and Kashmir support the state’s accession to Pakistan, why is it that Geelani, who has consistently advocated the state’s merger with Pakistan, continues to be regarded as the icon of the Kashmiri Muslim resistance movement? Related to this is another paradox: If many, if not most, Kashmiri Muslims, do not agree with, or even vehemently oppose, the Islamist version of Islam, as represented by Geelani and the Jamaat-e Islami, what accounts for Geelani’s charismatic appeal among many non-Jamaat Kashmiri Muslims? https://preview.redd.it/z5tp6lzxdafe1.png?width=896&format=png&auto=webp&s=1d28712bd8a04d88edd7c79713941c0433768e52 Geelani on the Genesis of the Kashmir Conflict Throughout the book Geelani reminds us that the roots of the Kashmir conflict lie in the Partition of India, when the then Indian princely states, which numbered almost 600, were given the choice of deciding between joining India or Pakistan. In making this decision, the rulers of these states, of which Jammu and Kashmir was one of the largest, were to be guided principally by the wishes of the majority of their subjects, which, in turn, were seen to be determined by their religion. Thus, if the majority of the population of a princely state were Muslim, the state was seen to be rightfully part of Pakistan, while states with a Hindu-majority were to join India. In addition, the decision of these states was also to be determined by other factors, such as geographical contiguity with either India or Pakistan, as the case might be, the direction of the flow of rivers that ran through them, and the presence of routes connecting them with either India or Pakistan. On all these counts, Geelani argues, Jammu and Kashmir ought to have acceded to Pakistan. It had an overwhelming Muslim-majority that enjoyed not just religious, but close historical, economic and cultural ties with the inhabitants of Pakistan. The only land route connecting the state with the outside world throughout the year led to Pakistan. The rivers that passed through the state all flowed into Pakistan. All the factors that needed to be taken into account in determining the princely states. future political status—accession to India or Pakistan—therefore, logically demanded, Geelani stresses, that Jammu and Kashmir join Pakistan. [3] Hence, he writes, India’s repeated claims that the state is an ‘unbreakable part. (atoot ang) of India are without any merit whatsoever. [4] Further building his argument that Muslim-majority Jammu and Kashmir should have formed part of Pakistan, rather than what he calls ‘Hindu’ India, Geelani claims that Muslims are a community/nation (qaum) wholly separate from the Hindus. He equates India with Hindus, overlooking the fact that India’s Muslim population outnumbers that of Pakistan. He projects Muslims (as he does Hindus) as a monolithic, homogenous community, defined by a singular interpretation of religion, and bereft of cultural, ethnic, and other divisions. He depicts Muslims as radically different from Hindus, and as allegedly having nothing at all in common with them. ‘It is absolutely true’, he wrote in a letter written in 1994 to the then Chief Minister of Jammu and Kashmir, Farooq Abdullah, ‘that the Muslims are a complete separate nation on the basis of their religion, culture, civilisation, customs and practices, and thought. Their nationalism and the foundation of their unity cannot be based on their homeland, race, language, colour or economic system. Rather, the basis of their unity is Islam and Islam alone, and their belief that there is no God but Allah and that Muhammad is Allah’s prophet.’ Hence, he insisted, Hindus and Muslims were ‘two different nations’ [5], implying, possibly, that they were simply incapable of living together amicably. That is why, he argued, the Muslim League had demanded, and had won, a separate Muslim Pakistan based on this ‘two nation theory’. This is also why, he suggested, Muslim-majority Jammu and Kashmir must be a part of Pakistan, rather than India. With Muslims and Hindus being seen as by definition opposed to each other on virtually every count, Geelani argues that the logic of the ‘two nation theory’, which he claims even Hindu leaders had finally accepted by 1947, demands that Muslim-majority Jammu and Kashmir should become part of Pakistan. On the other hand, he suggests, if the state were to be part of India, it would be tantamount to a virtual apostasy for the Kashmiri Muslims, who would, so he claims, have to give up their nationality, based on Islam, for one based on Indian-ness, which he implicitly equates with Hinduism. Given the underlying Hindu framework on which Indian nationalism is based, Geelani seems to argue, this would result in the Kashmiri Muslims losing their sense of separate identity based on Islam. Accession to India would result, he claims, in the Kashmiri Muslims having to live perpetually under ‘Hindu slavery’.[6] In order to further reinforce his argument for the accession of Jammu and Kashmir to Pakistan, Geelani indicates what he regards as the inconsistencies, indeed contradictions, in India’s stance on Kashmir by comparing its policy with regard to two other erstwhile princely states in 1947 which, like Jammu and Kashmir, were ruled by princes whose religion was different from that of the majority of their subjects: Hyderabad and Junagadh. Both these states had a Hindu-majority but were under Muslim rulers. Both the Nizam of Hyderabad and the Nawab of Junagadh chose to join Pakistan, but India protested, arguing that this would be a violation of the wishes of the majority of their subjects, who were Hindus, and that, therefore, both the states were logically part of India. With regard to these two states, Geelani points out, India’s claims rested in the argument that the factor of paramount significance in their deciding between India and Pakistan was the religion of the majority of their subjects. That being the case, Geelani contends, India’s claims on Muslim-majority Jammu and Kashmir are illegitimate and clearly contradict the principle it adopted in order to annex Hyderabad and Junagadh. [7] Challenging the Claim of Kashmir’s Accession to India Despite what Geelani argues was the compelling case for Jammu and Kashmir joining Pakistan, events dictated otherwise. Geelani’s description of critical events in Jammu and Kashmir in the wake of the Partition provide an interesting and compelling counterpoise to the official Indian narrative, highlighting various aspects that are ignored in the latter in order to build the case for justifying Indian control over Jammu and Kashmir. By excavating numerous developments that are conspicuously absent in the official Indian narrative—the slaughter of tens of thousands of Muslims in Jammu by Hindu mobs, anti-Muslim Hindu chauvinist groups and the Hindu Maharaja’s forces, the perceived Hindu and anti-Muslim nature of the Indian state, the pathetic conditions of India’s Muslims, and India’s refusal to act on its promises to the international community to allow the Kashmiris to determine their own political future—Geelani’s counter-narrative brings out vividly the underlying roots of the pervasive and continuous opposition to Indian rule among many Kashmiri Muslims. Geelani argues that the ‘Hindu’ rulers of the newly-independent Dominion of India plotted to prevent what he regards as the natural and logical accession of Jammu and Kashmir to Pakistan. To begin with, he writes, they prevailed upon the departing British to have the district of Gurdaspur, in present-day Indian Punjab, to be given to India although it then had a Muslim-majority and, therefore, ought to have become part of Pakistan. The reason for this departure from the logic that informed the partition of the Punjab was, he argues, to provide India land access to Jammu and Kashmir, the road to Jammu leading through Gurdaspur. [8] Then, in July 1947, a month before the Partition, he goes on, the Hindu Maharaja of Jammu, in league with Hindu chauvinist forces, such as the Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh and the Hindu Mahasabha, ordered the disarming of all Muslim soldiers and policemen in the state and confiscated all weapons owned by Muslims. The Maharaja, Geelani relates, ‘left no stone unturned in order to suppress and destroy the Muslim-majority in Jammu and Kashmir’. [9] Shortly after, on the orders of the Maharaja, the state’s army, working in tandem with these viscerally anti-Muslim Hindu groups, set about slaughtering Muslims in the Jammu province on a vast scale. In this orgy of violence, tens of thousands of Muslims lost their lives, and many more were forced to flee across the border to Pakistan. Geelani notes that even as this dance of naked violence was taking place in Jammu, calm prevailed in the Muslim-dominated Kashmir Valley, where the small Hindu minority remained unaffected by the horrors of the Partition, being protected by their Muslim neighbours. Following the disarming of the state’s Muslim population, who, for over a century, had labored under heavy disabilities under Hindu Dogra rule, and the large-scale violence directed against them, Geelani writes, Muslim tribesmen from Pakistan’s northern regions entered Kashmir in order, as he puts it, ‘to save their Kashmiri Muslim brethren’. In contrast to Indian authorities and scholars, who term this as a ‘tribal invasion’ and as having been motivated by the lust for loot and plunder, Geelani describes this armed incursion as a well-meaning response of the tribesmen to the plight of ‘their oppressed Kashmiri Muslim brothers’. [10] Indian accounts focus on widespread destruction wrought by the tribesmen, including rape, robbery and murder, but this is completely absent in Geelani’s account. Presumably, this is too embarrassing for Geelani to admit, or else he considers the Indian account to be false and motivated. Indian accounts portray the tribesmen as having been mobilized, armed and facilitated by the Pakistani army. In contrast, Geelani sees them as spontaneously rushing to the rescue of the beleaguered Kashmiri Muslims. While Indian sources attribute the failure of the tribesmen to capture Srinagar, Kashmir’s capital, to their being diverted by engaging in widespread loot and mayhem, Geelani claims that this was because ‘they were not organised. and that, therefore, ‘their actions were not effective’. [11] In the wake of the tribal incursion/invasion, Geelani writes, the Maharaja fled Srinagar and headed to Jammu, appealing to India for help. India agreed to do so only if the Maharaja acceded to India. Thereupon, the Maharaja is said to have signed the Instrument of Accession, but whether this actually happened, so Geelani claims, is ‘doubtful’. [12] Even if one supposes that the Instrument of Accession were at all genuine, he says, it was, in any case, ‘conditional’ ‘temporary. and ‘limited’. Even Indian leaders agreed, he relates, that this was a stop-gap measure and that once peace were restored in the state the people of Jammu and Kashmir would be given the right to determine their political future through a free and fair plebiscite. In other words, he contends, the Instrument of Accession did not mean that Jammu and Kashmir had become an integral and permanent part of India. Further, Geelani argues, the Maharaja’s decision to join India did not represent the desire of most Kashmiri Muslims, who, if given the chance, would have opted for Pakistan instead. [13] Reminding his readers of undeniable historical facts that the Indian establishment might no doubt now find embarrassing, Geelani notes that it was India—and not Pakistan, nor the people of Jammu and Kashmir—that took the Kashmir issue to the United Nations. [14] In late 1948 and then again in early 1949, the UN Security Council passed two resolutions, which were accepted both by India and Pakistan, calling for the settlement of the Kashmir conflict through a free and fair plebiscite in which the people of the state would be allowed to decide for themselves to join either India or Pakistan. Geelani points out that Indian leaders repeatedly issued statements wherein they promised to hold such a plebiscite. He quotes several public statements of India’s first Prime Minister Jawaharlal Nehru in this regard, including one in which Nehru is said to have solemnly declared, ‘with the whole world as witness’ that India would uphold its promise to the people of Jammu and Kashmir of allowing a plebiscite to choose between India and Pakistan, and that India ‘would certainly fulfil this promise even if the people voted against India’. If the majority of the people of the state voted against India, Nehru added, India would be saddened but would still accept the peoples. verdict. [15] Despite this, Geelani notes, in 1954 India’s rulers began singing a different tune, reneging on their promise to the international community to grant the people of Jammu and Kashmir the right to determine their political future through a free and fair plebiscite. In that year, he says, India maneuvered to seek to incorporate Jammu and Kashmir as a part of India and to bring it under what Geelani terms ‘Indian imperialistic control’.[16] This, he says, it sought to do by instigating what he considers the unrepresentative Jammu and Kashmir state assembly (elected, he suggests, through widespread rigging of votes so as to form a pro-India government) to declare the state’s permanent accession to India.[17] Since then, he says, India has used this action as its main argument to justify its control occupation of Jammu and Kashmir. Contradicting the official Indian stance, Geelani argues that the declaration of permanent accession to India by the state assembly cannot be said to have any validity at all. The state assembly, he claims, was not representative of the people, and in any case it did not have the mandate of the people to make a declaration of this sort. In other words, he contends, this declaration cannot in any sense be a substitute for the plebiscite that the UN Security Council Resolutions call for and that Indian leaders, till 1954, repeatedly promised to hold in the disputed state. [18] Furthermore, Geelani points that according to the 1951 UN Security Council Resolution on Jammu and Kashmir, the state assembly did not possess the power or prerogative to alter the political status of the state, and so its step did not have any validity in international law. He quotes the then Indian representative to the UN, BN Rao as having affirmed before the Security Council in March 1951 that no opinion of the state assembly on the political status of the state of Jammu and Kashmir would impact on the issue of plebiscite in Jammu and Kashmir that India had agreed to hold. [19] It is for this right of self-determination through plebiscite that what Geelani repeatedly refers to as ‘the people of Jammu and Kashmir. or, simply, ‘the Kashmiri people’ have been consistently demanding ever since 1947. This is something, he says, that the world community, as represented by the UN, and India itself have solemnly promised them. It is also a basic human right, he insists. By continuing to deny the Kashmiris this right, which, Geelani says, is their birth-right and a basic human right, India’s claim of being the ‘world’s largest democracy. is very evidently a complete sham. [20]
Geelani repeatedly stresses that the ‘people of Jammu and Kashmir. have, since 1947 onwards, been pressing for India to live up to its promise of arranging for a plebiscite for them to determine their political future on the lines called for by the UN Security Council Resolutions. This, he says, they have been consistently struggling for, using peaceful means of protest, ever since 1947. [21] Groups like his own Jamaat-e Islami, he says, even decided (in the early 1970s) to contest elections for this very purpose so that, as elected representatives, they could forcefully articulate the demand for self-determination and plebiscite. Geelani himself was elected to the state assembly as a candidate from the Muttahida Muslim Mahaz (‘The Muslim United Front.), most recently in 1987. That election, he writes, that proved to be a turning point in the history of the Kashmiri struggle for self-determination. He claims that the Muslim United Front was poised to win the elections by a considerable majority but that this was sabotaged by the Government of India, which feared that it would refuse to toe its line if it came to power. [22] Geelani repeats a point made by numerous observers—that the widespread rigging of this election in Jammu and Kashmir (as well as all previous ones) and the indiscriminate arrests and brutal treatment of Muslim United Front workers and candidates clearly suggested to the Kashmiris that peaceful methods to win the right to self-determination would never work due to Indian intransigence. Once again, he says, India’s slogans of democracy were exposed as a complete farce. It was now clear to the people of Kashmir, he says, that India would never allow a truly democratically-elected government to come to power in the state, for, he claims, such a government, reflecting the genuine aspirations of the majority of the people of Jammu and Kashmir, would advocate the state’s separation from India. [23] It was then, he says, and faced with no other option, that, in 1989, some Kashmiri youth decided that the time had come to take to the militant path to seek to force India to agree to live up to its promise of allowing the people of Jammu and Kashmir to determine their own political future. By explicating this background to the launching of the militant struggle in Kashmir, Geelani is careful to point out that it was resorted to more than half a century after 1947, when over five decades of peaceful struggle for the right to self-determination had completely failed. In other words, he suggests, the ongoing militant movement in Kashmir is not at all meaningless violence for its own sake that its Indian critics accuse it to be. Geelani denounces the Indian state’s and media’s description of the militant movement as ‘terrorism’ which, he argues, is a crude means to seek to rob it of its legitimacy and to defame it in the eyes of the world. He charges India with hypocrisy in describing the struggle in Kashmir as ‘terrorism. or ‘communalism’ arguing that it is no different from, and as valid as, India’s struggle for freedom from British rule. In a letter written in 1990 from prison in Naini jail, Allahabad, to Chandrashekar, the then Indian Prime Minister, Geelani stressed: ‘Indians fought the British for the sake of freedom both at the political level and through armed struggle. Gandhi used non-violence and the political platform, while Bhagat Singh and Netaji Subhash Chandra Bose used the path of armed struggle. So, then, how can you [India] deny the Kashmiris the same right and seek to crush them militarily? The British tried to use force to quash the Indian freedom struggle […] but failed and had to leave India. The same will happen to India [in Kashmir]. [24] Geelani also reminded the Indian Prime Minister that in the years following its independence India had supported numerous liberation struggles for self-determination of oppressed peoples, such as the Palestinians and the black South Africans. It had even intervened militarily to create Bangladesh. [25] How, then, he asked him, could India deny the same right and freedom to the Kashmiris, and crush their struggle through force, indiscriminate killings and widespread violation of human rights? [26] The militant movement in Kashmir, Geelani claims, is not aimed at spreading terror in India, unlike what Indian sources often allege. Rather, he insists, it aims at forcing India to agree to let the people of Jammu and Kashmir decide their own political future. Once that happens, he says, the people of Jammu and Kashmir would be willing to have good neighbourly relations with India. In other words, Geelani points out, the movement is not impelled by a blind, irrational hatred for India (or the Hindus), as is alleged by numerous Indian commentators. But, he repeatedly insists, the armed struggle will carry on till India relents and agrees to act on its promises to the people of Jammu and Kashmir and the international community. No stop-gap or half-way measures, such as more autonomy for Jammu and Kashmir within the ambit Indian Constitution, restoring the pre-1953 status of the state, or elections, he says, can or will lead to the Kashmiris calling off their armed resistance to Indian rule. This can only happen, he says, when they are able to exercise the right to political self-determination through plebiscite as envisaged by the UN Security Resolutions, which India has solemnly promised the international community to allow for. [27] In repeatedly stressing this point, Geelani makes very clear that no amount of economic assistance from India would cause the Kashmiris to weaken their resolve to press India to allow them to determine their own political future. ‘So as long as the rulers in Delhi keep parroting the slogan that [Jammu and Kashmir is] an inseparable part of India,. he stresses, ‘no solution to the Kashmir problem can be found. The only way out is by acting on the UN resolutions, which India itself has accepted’. [28] In a letter to the then newly-elected American President Bill Clinton in 1993, Geelani wrote: ‘As long as the Government of India refuses to accept the basic and inherent right of the 12 million people [of Jammu and Kashmir] to determine their political future and act on the UN Security Council resolutions in this regard, this [militant] movement will continue’. [29] At the same time as Geelani insists that the people of Jammu and Kashmir be allowed to decide between joining India or Pakistan, he repeatedly stresses that what he terms as the ‘people of the state. would never agree to being with India and would accept no deal brokered between India and Pakistan that legitimizes Indian rule in Jammu and Kashmir. [30]
submitted by MujeTeHaakh to Kashmiri [link] [comments] |
2025.01.26 07:00 danteraditya is there any option disable touchpad while typing?, is so annoy that i usually my palm rest on a touchpad and started pointing and clicking around
is there any option to custom it on regedit or sumn else ? help me guys
submitted by danteraditya to laptops [link] [comments]
2025.01.26 07:00 jjajangmyeooow shein money tree
 | currently new to these kind of shein games but still posting my referral code on shein money tree, kindly search for my code and i’ll do the same~~ submitted by jjajangmyeooow to Shein [link] [comments] |
2025.01.26 07:00 FeistyPhilosophy461 Read poll 053f37b417c0343c26c9ee67ff8f07631073e842a1d4fe427dd34f9551aa20fd4a
View Poll
submitted by FeistyPhilosophy461 to AbbychampNSFW [link] [comments]
2025.01.26 07:00 Christopher15310 Que Canción De Ice Cube Les Gusta Para Que Este En Gta San Andreas Para Radio Los Santos
Cuál de estas 3 canciones de ice cube les gustaría que estén en GTA San Andreas
View Poll
submitted by Christopher15310 to GTA [link] [comments]
2025.01.26 07:00 foundfootagefan Cardo - a podcast client for Windows, Mac or Linux that can be synchronized with Antennapod and other apps using Nextcloud Gppoder and Gpodder/Opodsync.
submitted by foundfootagefan to coolgithubprojects [link] [comments]
2025.01.26 07:00 Onyxkalmia Should I just message everyone I have messaged on reddit before?
For fun? Except the pedos and other ones that I shouldn't message ofc
submitted by Onyxkalmia to teenagers [link] [comments]
2025.01.26 07:00 whennotnow 2am-5am 10 minute $3 readings
If you’ll pay $3 for 10 minutes of psychic services I know a 10 minute session with me is of equal worth to you.
submitted by whennotnow to PsychicServices [link] [comments]
2025.01.26 07:00 Persephone160 Children's picture book with recipe cards
Looking for a book I was given by my school as a 4-6th grader between 2010 and 2012. It was a picture book with paper pages, and at the back there were pages that were thicker and perferated that pulled apart into recipe cards.
I think the cover was purple and the main character was a girl who liked to jump rope. She might have been a redhead with two braids.
The book was aimed at getting kids interested in cooking healthy foods and a lot of the recipes were things that you could trust a 10-12 year old to make mostly unattended.
submitted by Persephone160 to whatsthatbook [link] [comments]
2025.01.26 07:00 Volcano003 21M from Mauritius island | friendship?
Hey everyone! I’m looking to meet new people and hopefully build lasting friendships. I value honesty and effort in friendships and enjoy connecting with people who share similar interests. I love trying out new cuisines, traveling, and unwinding by the beach. When I’m not exploring, I enjoy watching vlogs, movies, and learning about different cultures. Feel free to reach out anytime!
submitted by Volcano003 to MakeNewFriendsHere [link] [comments]
2025.01.26 07:00 AutoModerator Weekly Discussion - January 26, 2025
Welcome to the Weekly Discussion. Please read the disclaimer, guidelines, and rules before participating.
Disclaimer:
Moderation is less stringent on this thread than on the rest of the sub, but people are still expected to behave and respect each other’s opinions.
That said, consider all information posted here with several liberal heaps of salt, and always cross check any information you may read on this thread with known sources. Any (coin/trade) information posted in this open thread may be highly misleading, and could be an attempt to manipulate new readers by known "pump and dump (PnD) groups" for their own profit. BEWARE of such practices and exercise utmost caution before acting on any trade tip mentioned here.
Please be careful about what information you share and the actions you take. Do not share the amounts of your portfolios (why not just share percentage instead?). Do not share your private keys or wallet seed. Use strong, non-SMS 2FA if possible. Beware of scammers and be smart. Do not invest more than you can afford to lose, and do not fall for pyramid schemes, promises of unrealistic returns (get-rich-quick schemes), and other common scams.
The LTO Network team will never ask you to send your coins to them, to get something in return or otherwise.
Rules:
· Be respectful. Behave with civility and politeness. Do not use offensive, racist or homophobic language.
· Discussion topics must be related to cryptocurrency/LTO Network.
· Comments will be sorted by newest first.
submitted by AutoModerator to LTONetwork [link] [comments]
2025.01.26 07:00 Willing_Report2803 IE 3315 - Excel Solver Help.
 | I'm trying to solve a question using Simplex LP. And its showing the attached image. I was told to only use the Simplex LP. But it's not working with it. How can I solve this issue? https://preview.redd.it/ntenh280eafe1.png?width=707&format=png&auto=webp&s=1f7c7c213310a1db2d79c312e1d8579bfce89cf6 submitted by Willing_Report2803 to utarlington [link] [comments] |
2025.01.26 07:00 Sensitive-Seesaw-650 Thoughts on my mods so far and what to do next?
 | Picked up a 2018 q5 premium plus and have added a few things over the last year or so. Lowering Springs 21” OEM SQ5 Wheels Honeycomb grill Cosmetically I’m pretty satisfied now, although I want to tint windows darker and black out the chrome/silver on the bumper, front lip and trim. Performance wise, I wouldn’t mind a better sound when I step on the gas, and maybe improve speed. What should I do, maybe a cold air intake? Thanks submitted by Sensitive-Seesaw-650 to AudiQ5 [link] [comments] |
2025.01.26 07:00 YourRedditHusband The Mythology of Your Delusion
B,
I don’t think you fully understand what you lost when you pushed me away. I gave you everything—my time, my love, my honesty, my trust—and you treated it like it was nothing. You never returned it in kind. You had the rare privilege of being with someone who truly cared for you, even in the face of your lies, manipulation, and your egregious betrayal.
But that privilege is gone now, and you’ll never have it again.
Maybe in your next relationship, you’ll choose honesty over deceit. Maybe you won’t lie about the things you’ve done, or pretend you “can’t remember” when someone asks for clarity. Maybe you’ll stop using your emotions as a punishment or weaponizing someone else’s vulnerabilities to protect your fragile and pathetic ego. Or maybe you’ll stay exactly the same. Either way, it doesn’t matter—because it will never be with me.
I was the one person who saw through your delusions, who didn’t feed into your fantasies, and who dared to demand real respect from you. And for that, I was punished. You thought you could gaslight me into submission, overwhelm my mind with chaos, and chip away at my sense of self until I became someone easier to control. You did all of this all while accusing me of doing it to you.
But, you failed. You are weak, and I saw right through you and you hated it and simply could not handle it.
You never respected my boundaries because you saw them as a threat to your selfishness. You never cared about the damage you inflicted, only about what you could take from me without having to give anything in return. You act like you did me such a favor, but you actually only hurt me.
Neither I nor my time are a commodity, and I refused to be treated like one.
You say I’m cruel now, because I wouldn't engage with your nonsense. You call my silence unfair and my distance undeserved.
I started blocking you because all you deserve is my silence.
The truth is, YOU taught me how to master apathy. YOU mistook my calmness as me being uncaring, DESPITE me showing you time and time again that you were mistaken! But you weren't "mistaken", were you? No, you're simply manipulative and disingenuous.
When someone shows me, time and time again, that they don’t give a shit about me? Now I learn to stop giving a shit about them.
I remember all too well what it felt like to be “loved” by you, you corpulent wreck. The endless cycle of deception, gaslighting, chaos, and isolation... No matter how hard I tried, no matter how much I gave, it was never enough for you.
And it never would have been, because your needs are a bottomless pit. I see that clearly now.
I regret that I stayed as long as I did. I regret that I lied to myself, thinking I could "save" you, that if I just said the Right Thing™ in the Right Way™, that you’d change.
I was wrong. All I did was enable you.
I gave you love without accountability—I offered support without consequence.
My love was very nearly without condition.
And you took everything I had to give without a second thought.
You didn’t just lose me—you lost someone extraordinary. I don't say that with vanity, but with certainty in myself that I would ALWAYS do my part, and I would ALWAYS try to better myself.
I’m not like the shallow attachments you cling to; weak men who don’t challenge you. Men who don't dare make you uncomfortable by asking for the bare minimum.
I loved you with my whole heart, flaws and all that I clearly saw, and you threw it away because you can't handle the shame of being seen.
And now you’re scrambling to punish me, desperately, because I walked away from you and your ego can't handle it. You made me homeless and stole nearly everything I owned, all because you're a fragile and weak child.
All because I threaten your delusional fantasy of yourself.
The truth is, *you never deserved me."
You never deserved my love, my loyalty, or my patience.
And you’ll never have it again.
If you truly loved me, as you claim, then you would've made things right. But, I know you won't make anything right. You wouldn't have betrayed me to protect your ego if you loved me. I know that you do not have the capacity to love or to truly care.
I know you will never apologize, or even send me my things that you stole. I left far more value than what was given to me in my belongings there, not even including the drugs which you stole from me.
You're the scummiest and trashiest person I've ever dated. You don't deserve the position you're in or the family you have.
I’ve moved on and I won’t look back.🤙🏻
🐝
(PS, the B stands for Betrayer.)
submitted by YourRedditHusband to UnsentLetters [link] [comments]
2025.01.26 07:00 Malozay20 Would love to build a PC myself
Hello guys (and girls)
I'm a french man who enjoy to play :)
I don't know anything about pc building 😂
Would you be so kind to help me find good parts to build a good PC.
Budget : 1500-2000€ (1600-2100 USD)
Games : BG3, Indiana Jones, Wu Kong, Cyberpunk ...
I want to be able to play smoothly in high/ultra setting in 1080p at least
Thank your for your help !
submitted by Malozay20 to PcBuild [link] [comments]
2025.01.26 07:00 beetlejeweled giant sequoia
submitted by beetlejeweled to mildlypenis [link] [comments]
2025.01.26 07:00 katnerys-targaryen Choices PSA: VIP Only Premium Sale from January 25 to January 29
 | submitted by katnerys-targaryen to ChoicesVIP [link] [comments] |
2025.01.26 07:00 AutoModerator Sunday, Jan 26 2025 - Weekly Off Topic / Complaints / Pictures / Everything Else Thread
Welcome to the weekly thread that covers everything off topic, fluff, etc!
Feel free to post anything to this thread, as long as it has some relation to Ubiquiti - pictures, rants, whines, complaints, easy small questions you don’t want to make a whole post for, or even just sharing the picture of your cat sitting on top of your EdgeRouter!
Only rules here are to be civil, no personal attacks, etc stuff like that.
Have a great week everyone!
submitted by AutoModerator to Ubiquiti [link] [comments]
2025.01.26 07:00 BoneGrampa Best Way to Proxy or Sculpt Feculant Gnarlmaws?
I want to run Horticulous Slimux and 3 Trees. However I don't even have one and I think out of all the financial investments this game requires terrain pieces are my least favorite.
What are the cheaper ways you've gone about this? What are your favorite STL's. Have you crafted your own? Since it doesn't have a base it's hard for me to figure out the dimensions.
submitted by BoneGrampa to MaggotkinofNurgle [link] [comments]